Free Cheatsheet · AI HL · SL 1.2–1.4

IB Math AI HL Sequences & Series — Complete Cheatsheet

Every sequences-and-series skill and trap for IB Mathematics Applications & Interpretation HL — arithmetic & geometric nth term, series sums, sum to infinity, sigma notation, and the AI applications of compound growth, savings & least-n. Hand-built by an IBO-certified Singapore tutor, with a print-ready PDF to download.

Topic: Sequences & Series (Number & Algebra) Syllabus: SL 1.2–1.4 Read time: ~10 minutes Last updated: Jul 2026

Sequences and series are where IB Mathematics Applications & Interpretation HL first turns pattern-spotting into modelling. AI treats them less as abstract algebra and more as the mathematics of growth over time: a salary that rises by a fixed raise each year, savings that compound, a drug that decays between doses, a population that settles to a steady level. A calculator is always allowed, so the marks live in recognising which pattern a worded problem hides — arithmetic or geometric — choosing the right formula, and reading the GDC's answer correctly, not in grinding out terms by hand.

This cheatsheet condenses the whole of SL 1.2–1.4 — arithmetic and geometric nth terms, the two series sums, the sum to infinity, sigma notation, and the AI applications of compound growth, savings and "how many terms" least-n problems — onto one page, and flags the traps that quietly cost method marks. The print-ready PDF is at the bottom, free to download.

§1 — Two engines: arithmetic vs geometric SL 1.2–1.3

A sequence is an ordered list of numbers; add its terms and you get a series. Almost every question runs on one of two engines: the arithmetic sequence adds a fixed common difference $d$, and the geometric sequence multiplies by a fixed common ratio $r$.

Arithmetic (add $d$):$u_n=u_1+(n-1)d$
Geometric (times $r$):$u_n=u_1 r^{\,n-1}$
Sum to infinity:$S_\infty=\dfrac{u_1}{1-r}$ — only when $|r| < 1$ (geometric)
TrickTo classify a sequence, test consecutive terms: a constant difference $u_{n+1}-u_n$ means arithmetic; a constant ratio $u_{n+1}/u_n$ means geometric.
TrapIt takes $(n-1)$ steps to reach the $n$th term, not $n$ — so both formulas carry the exponent/multiplier $n-1$. Slipping to $n$ is the single biggest source of dropped marks on this topic.

§2 — Arithmetic sequences: the nth term SL 1.2

An arithmetic sequence steps up (or down) by the same amount every time. Fix $u_1$ and $d$ and you can reach any term directly.

nth term:$u_n=u_1+(n-1)d$
Common difference:$d=u_{n+1}-u_n$ — the same for every consecutive pair
From two terms:$u_j-u_i=(j-i)\,d$ — solve for $d$ first, then back-substitute for $u_1$
TrickGiven two terms, the number of steps between the $i$th and $j$th is $j-i$, not $j$. Divide the change in value by the change in position to get $d$ in one line.
TrapCount gaps, not terms: reaching the $n$th term takes $n-1$ jumps of $d$. Writing $u_n=u_1+nd$ shifts every answer by one $d$.

§3 — Arithmetic series: summing the terms SL 1.2

The series is the running total $S_n$ of the first $n$ terms. There are two versions of the same formula — pick the one that matches what the question gives you.

Know the last term:$S_n=\dfrac{n}{2}\,(u_1+u_n)$
Know $d$:$S_n=\dfrac{n}{2}\,\big(2u_1+(n-1)d\big)$
TrickAverage the first and last term, then multiply by how many terms there are: $S_n=\left(\dfrac{u_1+u_n}{2}\right)n$. That is all the first formula says.
NoteThe two forms are the same equation — substitute $u_n=u_1+(n-1)d$ into the first to get the second. Use the top one when you already know $u_n$, the bottom one when you only know $d$.

§4 — Geometric sequences: the nth term SL 1.3

A geometric sequence scales by the same factor $r$ each step, so its terms grow or decay exponentially — exactly the shape of compound interest and radioactive-style decay.

nth term:$u_n=u_1 r^{\,n-1}$
Common ratio:$r=\dfrac{u_{n+1}}{u_n}$ — the same for every consecutive pair
Grow or decay:$|r| > 1$ grows without bound; $0 < |r| < 1$ shrinks toward $0$
TrapThe exponent is $n-1$, so the first term uses $r^0=1$. Writing $u_1 r^{\,n}$ shifts every term one place along the sequence.
TrickFor "the first term below/above a level", scroll a GDC table of $u_n$ until it crosses — and always check the term just before, since a threshold is an inequality and the answer sits right at the boundary.

§5 — Geometric series: summing the terms SL 1.3

Adding the first $n$ geometric terms has a closed form given in the booklet in two equivalent shapes.

Sum of $n$ terms:$S_n=\dfrac{u_1(r^{\,n}-1)}{r-1}=\dfrac{u_1(1-r^{\,n})}{1-r},\quad r\neq 1$
TrickThe two forms are identical — use the left one when $r > 1$ and the right one when $|r| < 1$, so the top and bottom stay positive and you avoid sign slips.
TrapThe series sum uses $r^{\,n}$ (with $n$ = the number of terms), one power higher than the $r^{\,n-1}$ in the $n$th-term formula. Mixing the two exponents is a classic error.

§6 — Sum to infinity SL 1.3

If the terms shrink fast enough, adding infinitely many of them still gives a finite total. This happens precisely when the ratio is a proper fraction.

Converges when:$|r| < 1$, i.e. $-1 < r < 1$ — the terms must tend to $0$
Sum to infinity:$S_\infty=\dfrac{u_1}{1-r}$
Find $r$ from $S_\infty$:rearrange to $r=1-\dfrac{u_1}{S_\infty}$
0 u₁ u₁r u₁r² S∞ S∞ = u₁ / (1 − r)
Each term is a fixed fraction r of the one before, so the running total edges toward the finite limit S∞ = u₁/(1−r) — shown here for r = ½. The gap to S∞ never quite closes, it just shrinks to nothing.
TrapThe sum to infinity exists only if $|r| < 1$. If $|r|\ge 1$ the terms do not shrink, the total runs off to infinity, and $\dfrac{u_1}{1-r}$ is meaningless — check $r$ before you quote it.
TrickGiven $u_1$ and $S_\infty$, don't re-derive: divide the first term by the sum and subtract from $1$ to get $r=1-\dfrac{u_1}{S_\infty}$ in one step.

§7 — Sigma notation SL 1.2

Sigma notation packs a whole sum into one symbol. The counter $k$ runs from the bottom value up to the top value, one term added for each.

Meaning:$\displaystyle\sum_{k=1}^{n} u_k = u_1+u_2+\cdots+u_n$
Linear sum:$\displaystyle\sum_{k=1}^{n}(pk+q)=p\,\dfrac{n(n+1)}{2}+qn$
TrickSplit the sum: $\sum(pk+q)=p\sum k+\sum q$. Here $\sum_{k=1}^{n}k=\tfrac{n(n+1)}{2}$, and the constant $q$ is added once per term, so $\sum q = qn$.
NoteRead the limits before anything else — they set how many terms you are adding. A sum from $k=0$ or $k=3$ has a different term count from one starting at $k=1$, which changes both the number of terms and $S_n$. Any sum with $\sum$ can also be typed straight into the GDC.

§8 — Compound growth & the least-n question SL 1.4

This is the headline AI application. Money, populations and investments grow geometrically, and the favourite Paper 2 question asks "after how many years / terms does it first pass a target?" — a least-$n$ problem best cracked on the GDC.

Compound growth:value after $n$ periods $=P(1+i)^{\,n}$, with rate $i$ per period
Least $n$ (growth):$P(1+i)^{\,n} > T\ \Rightarrow\ n > \dfrac{\ln(T/P)}{\ln(1+i)}$, then round up
Least $n$ (running total):smallest $n$ with $S_n=\tfrac{n}{2}\big(2u_1+(n-1)d\big)\ge$ target
TrickSkip the logs: on the GDC, tabulate the amount (or the running sum $S_n$) against $n$ and read off the first $n$ that clears the target. It is faster and sidesteps rounding slips entirely.
Trap$n$ is a whole number and the inequality is strict, so round up (take the ceiling) — never round to nearest. A value of $n>12.3$ means $n=13$, and you should confirm $S_{12}$ falls short while $S_{13}$ clears the goal.

§9 — Recurrences, steady states & bouncing balls SL 1.4

Two synthesis applications AI loves. A repeating dose or deposit that decays between steps is a linear recurrence, and a bouncing ball's total path length is a geometric series in disguise.

Linear recurrence:$A_{n+1}=rA_n+c$ — keep a fraction $r$, then add $c$ each step; iterate on the GDC for any $A_k$
Steady state:the fixed point solves $L=rL+c\ \Rightarrow\ L=\dfrac{c}{1-r}$
Bouncing-ball distance:$D=u_1+\dfrac{2u_1 r}{1-r}=u_1\,\dfrac{1+r}{1-r},\quad |r| < 1$
u₁ r u₁ r² u₁ r³u₁
Dropped from height u₁, the ball rebounds to r u₁, then r²u₁, … — a geometric sequence of peak heights. The total distance sums every rise and fall: D = u₁(1+r)/(1−r).
TrapFor the long-run limit divide by $1-r$, never by $r$. And in the bouncing ball, every bounce is counted twice (up and down) while the first drop counts once — that is why the numerator carries a factor of $2$ on the bounces but not on $u_1$.
NoteThe fixed point $L=\dfrac{c}{1-r}$ is exactly the same idea as a Markov steady state in AHL 1.15 — the long-run level a repeating process settles to, independent of where it started. The scalar recurrence here scales straight up to a matrix one there.

§10 — Exam attack plan All sections

Question cueWhat to doWatch for
"nth term of the sequence"Arithmetic $u_1+(n-1)d$; geometric $u_1 r^{\,n-1}$Exponent/multiplier is $n-1$, not $n$
"Sum of the first $n$ terms"AP $\tfrac{n}{2}(2u_1+(n-1)d)$; GP $\tfrac{u_1(r^{\,n}-1)}{r-1}$GP sum uses $r^{\,n}$, not $r^{\,n-1}$
"Find $d$ or $u_1$ from two terms"$u_j-u_i=(j-i)d$, then back-substituteSteps between terms $=j-i$, not $j$
"Total forever / sum to infinity"$S_\infty=\dfrac{u_1}{1-r}$Valid only when $|r| < 1$
"Evaluate a $\sum$ expression"Split $p\sum k+\sum q$, or type it into the GDCCheck the limits — how many terms?
"After how many years / terms…"GDC table, or $n>\dfrac{\ln(T/P)}{\ln(1+i)}$Round up (ceiling); strict inequality
"Repeated dose / long-run level"Recurrence $A_{n+1}=rA_n+c$; limit $\tfrac{c}{1-r}$Divide by $1-r$, not by $r$
"Total distance of a bouncing ball"$D=u_1\dfrac{1+r}{1-r}$Each bounce counts twice, the drop once

Worked Example — AI HL-Style Salary & Savings

Question (AI HL Paper 2 style — 6 marks)

Maya starts a job on an annual salary of $\$45\,000$. Her contract gives her a $4\%$ pay rise at the start of every year after the first, so her yearly salaries form a geometric sequence with first term $u_1=45\,000$ and ratio $r=1.04$.
(a) Find her salary in year $10$.
(b) Find her total earnings over the first $10$ years.
(c) Find the least number of complete years after which her total earnings first exceed $\$700\,000$.

Solution

  1. (a) Year 10 is the $10$th term, so use the exponent $n-1=9$: $u_{10}=45\,000\,(1.04)^{9}=45\,000\times1.42331=\$64\,049$ (nearest dollar). (M1)(A1) (the raise applies $9$ times by year 10, not $10$ — the $n-1$ trap.)
  2. (b) Total of the first $10$ terms is a geometric series: $S_{10}=\dfrac{u_1(r^{10}-1)}{r-1}=\dfrac{45\,000\,(1.04^{10}-1)}{0.04}=\$540\,275$ (nearest dollar). (M1)(A1)
  3. (c) Require $S_n=\dfrac{45\,000\,(1.04^{n}-1)}{0.04} > 700\,000$, i.e. $1.04^{n} > 1.6222$, so $n > \dfrac{\ln 1.6222}{\ln 1.04}=12.3$. Rounding up, $n=13$ years. (M1)(A1) (check: $S_{12}=\$676\,161 < 700\,000$ and $S_{13}=\$748\,208$ — the first to clear the target.)

Examiner's note: keep full calculator precision throughout — rounding $1.04^{9}$ early throws off the later parts. In part (c) the inequality is strict and $n$ counts whole years, so you must round up: reading $12.3$ as $12$ is the classic lost mark. The quickest safe route is a GDC table of $S_n$ against $n$ — scroll until the running total first passes $\$700\,000$. Give money answers with sensible units and rounding.

Common Student Questions

How do I tell whether a sequence is arithmetic or geometric?
Test consecutive terms. If the difference $u_{n+1}-u_n$ is the same each time, it is arithmetic with common difference $d$. If the ratio $u_{n+1}/u_n$ is the same each time, it is geometric with common ratio $r$. Check two or three pairs — a worded problem that says "increases by $\$200$ a year" is arithmetic, while "grows by 4% a year" or "halves each hour" is geometric.
Why is it $u_1 r^{\,n-1}$ and not $u_1 r^{\,n}$?
Because the first term has had the ratio applied zero times: $u_1=u_1 r^{0}=u_1$. By the $n$th term you have multiplied by $r$ a total of $n-1$ times, so $u_n=u_1 r^{\,n-1}$. The same logic gives $u_1+(n-1)d$ for arithmetic sequences: it takes $n-1$ steps to reach term $n$. Using $r^{\,n}$ or $nd$ shifts every answer one place along.
When does a geometric series have a sum to infinity?
Only when $|r| < 1$, that is $-1 < r < 1$. Then the terms shrink toward $0$ fast enough that the infinite total settles on the finite value $S_\infty=\dfrac{u_1}{1-r}$. If $|r|\ge 1$ the terms stay the same size or grow, the sum runs off to infinity, and the formula does not apply — always check $r$ before quoting a sum to infinity.
For "how many years" questions, should I use logs or the GDC?
Either works, and both are examinable. Logs give $n>\dfrac{\ln(T/P)}{\ln(1+i)}$ directly, but the safest method on Paper 2 is a GDC table: list the amount (or the running sum) against $n$ and read off the first $n$ that passes the target. Whichever you use, remember $n$ is a whole number and the inequality is strict, so you round up — never to the nearest integer.
There are two arithmetic-sum formulas — which one do I use?
They give the same answer, so use whichever fits your data. $S_n=\dfrac{n}{2}(u_1+u_n)$ is quickest when you already know the last term $u_n$ (just average the ends and multiply by $n$). $S_n=\dfrac{n}{2}\big(2u_1+(n-1)d\big)$ is the one to reach for when you know the common difference $d$ but not the last term. They are the same equation — the second is just the first with $u_n=u_1+(n-1)d$ substituted in.

Get the printable PDF cheatsheet — free

The same cheatsheet on one A4 page — formulas, methods and traps. No sign-in needed.