Free Cheatsheet · AHL 1.15

IB Math AA HL Proof by Induction — Complete Cheatsheet

The universal 4-step template, every question type, the full IB mark scheme map, and exam patterns from 2020–2025. Hand-built by an IBO-certified Singapore tutor with 15+ years of IB experience.

Topic: Proof by Mathematical Induction Syllabus: AHL 1.15 Read time: ~12 minutes Last updated: Apr 2026

Proof by mathematical induction is the only formal proof technique on the IB Mathematics Analysis & Approaches HL syllabus, and it is one of the highest-leverage topics in the entire course. Every question follows the same four-step skeleton — define the proposition, verify the base case, perform the inductive step, and state the conclusion — yet HL students consistently lose marks for the same handful of avoidable errors: writing "let $n = k$", omitting the conclusion sentence, missing one side of the base case, or fumbling the algebra in factorial and divisibility steps.

This cheatsheet condenses every question type, mark-scheme rubric, and exam-pattern observation from AHL 1.15 into one page you can revise from. If you want the printable PDF version, the full set of notes, the worked tutorials, and the marked-up solutions, scroll to the bottom for the download links and the gated full library.

§1 — The Universal 4-Step Template AHL 1.15

Every induction proof — regardless of type — follows exactly the same four-step skeleton. Master this skeleton first; the only thing that changes between question types is the algebra in Step 3.

Step 1 & 2 — Define and Base Case

Step 1 — State the proposition. Write: "Let $P(n)$ be the proposition that [full formula/statement] for all $n \geq 1$ (or $n \geq n_0$)."

Step 2 — Base case. Substitute $n = n_0$ (usually 1). Compute both LHS and RHS separately and show they are equal. Write: "Since LHS $=$ RHS, $P(1)$ is true." (R1)

TrickAlways compute both sides of the base case explicitly — even if it looks obvious. The IB awards R1 only when both sides are shown. Writing "LHS $= \tfrac{1}{2}$" without showing RHS $= \tfrac{1}{2}$ loses the mark.

Step 3 — Inductive Hypothesis & Inductive Step

Inductive hypothesis. Write: "Assume $P(k)$ is true for some $k \in \mathbb{Z}^+$, i.e. [formula with $k$]." (M1)

Inductive step. Show $P(k+1)$ using the hypothesis. The method depends on question type (see §2–§8). Arrive at the exact form of $P(k+1)$. (M1 + A1 + A1 + A1)

TrapNever write "Let $n = k$" or "Assume $n = k$ is true" — the IB mark scheme explicitly states: "Do not award M1 for statements such as 'let $n = k$'." You must write the formula.

Step 4 — Conclusion (Always Required)

Write in full: "Since $P(1)$ is true, and $P(k)$ true $\Rightarrow$ $P(k+1)$ true for all $k \in \mathbb{Z}^+$, by the principle of mathematical induction $P(n)$ is true for all $n \in \mathbb{Z}^+$." (R1)

TrapOmitting the conclusion sentence always costs R1, even if every other step is perfect. The IB awards this R1 only when at least 4 of the prior 6 marks have been earned.

IB Mark Scheme Map — Every Induction Question

MarkWhat it rewardsHow to earn itCommon loss
R1Base case correctBoth sides computed, equal shownOnly one side shown
M1Inductive hypothesis"Assume $P(k)$: [formula]"Writing "let $n=k$"
M1Setting up $P(k+1)$Splitting $\sum_{k+1} = \sum_k + f(k+1)$Skipping the split
A1Applying IHSubstituting IH formulaWrong substitution
A1Algebra stepSimplifying correctlyArithmetic error
A1Reaching targetArriving at exact $P(k+1)$ formStopping one step early
R1Conclusion sentenceFull sentence, references both stepsOmitting sentence
NoteFor the final R1 (conclusion): the IB requires at least 4 of the previous 6 marks. So even if your algebra has gaps, write the conclusion sentence every time — you can still earn it.

§2 — Sum Formula Proofs AHL 1.15

The most common induction type. Prove $\displaystyle\sum_{r=1}^{n} f(r) = S(n)$.

The Split-and-Substitute Method

The inductive step always follows this pattern:

$$\sum_{r=1}^{k+1} f(r) \;=\; \underbrace{\sum_{r=1}^{k} f(r)}_{\text{apply IH} = S(k)} + \underbrace{f(k+1)}_{\text{next term}} \;=\; S(k) + f(k+1) \;\overset{?}{=}\; S(k+1)$$

The challenge is the algebra: show $S(k) + f(k+1) = S(k+1)$.

TrickBefore starting the algebra, write on your paper: Next term: $f(k+1) = \ldots$   Target: $S(k+1) = \ldots$. This tells you exactly where you're heading. Never start manipulating without knowing the target.

Formula reference (must know — not in formula booklet)

$\displaystyle\sum_{r=1}^{n} r = \dfrac{n(n+1)}{2}$
$\displaystyle\sum_{r=1}^{n} r^2 = \dfrac{n(n+1)(2n+1)}{6}$
$\displaystyle\sum_{r=1}^{n} r^3 = \dfrac{n^2(n+1)^2}{4}$
$\displaystyle\sum_{r=1}^{n} \dfrac{1}{r(r+1)} = \dfrac{n}{n+1}$
$\displaystyle\sum_{r=1}^{n} \dfrac{r}{(r+1)!} = 1 - \dfrac{1}{(n+1)!}$
$\displaystyle\sum_{r=1}^{n} \binom{r}{1} = \binom{n+1}{2}$

Critical algebra tricks

Factorial trick: $\dfrac{1}{(k+1)!} = \dfrac{k+2}{(k+2)!}$ — lets you combine fractions with different factorial denominators.

Polynomial-sum factor trick: after adding $f(k+1)$ to $S(k)$, factor out $(k+1)$ from both terms — the target $S(k+1)$ almost always has $(k+1)$ as a factor:

$$\frac{k(k+1)}{2} + (k+1) = (k+1)\left(\frac{k}{2}+1\right) = \frac{(k+1)(k+2)}{2}$$

TrapThe most common factorial error: for the sum $\sum_{r=1}^{n}\dfrac{r}{(r+1)!}$, when $r = k+1$, the denominator is $\mathbf{(k+2)!}$, not $(k+1)!$. The $r+1$ in the denominator means you substitute $r=k+1$ to get $(k+1)+1 = k+2$.
TrickFor alternating sums like $1 - 4 + 9 - \ldots + (-1)^{n+1}n^2 = (-1)^{n+1}\dfrac{n(n+1)}{2}$: the next term is $(-1)^{(k+1)+1}(k+1)^2 = (-1)^{k+2}(k+1)^2 = (-1)^k(k+1)^2$. Always simplify the sign before proceeding.
NoteFor combinatorics sums involving $\binom{r}{1}$, the key identity is Pascal's Rule: $\binom{k+1}{2} + \binom{k+1}{1} = \binom{k+2}{2}$. This comes directly from the $\binom{n}{r}$ definition and is the only algebra needed.

§3 — Divisibility Proofs AHL 1.15

Prove that $d \mid f(n)$ for all $n \in \mathbb{Z}^+$.

The three divisibility strategies

Strategy 1 — The Split: Write $f(k+1) = A \cdot f(k) + (\text{multiple of } d)$. Apply IH: $f(k) = dm$, so $A \cdot f(k) = Adm$, and the whole thing $= d(\ldots)$.

Strategy 2 — Add and subtract: $a^{k+1} - b^{k+1} = a \cdot a^k - b \cdot b^k = \underbrace{(a-b)}_{\text{divisor}} \cdot a^k + b\underbrace{(a^k - b^k)}_{\text{IH}}$.

Strategy 3 — Factor out the base (most common): e.g. $25 \cdot 5^{2k} = 17 \cdot 5^{2k} + 8 \cdot 5^{2k}$ — creates the divisor 17 explicitly.

TrickAt the start of the inductive step, always write: "Let $f(k) = dm$ for some $m \in \mathbb{Z}$." Then at the end write: "$= d(\ldots)$ where $\ldots \in \mathbb{Z}$, so divisible by $d$." These two sentences bookend your argument.

Common IB divisibility claims

  • $9^n - 1 \equiv 0 \pmod{8}$
  • $5^{2n} - 2^{3n} \equiv 0 \pmod{17}$
  • $3^{2n}+7 \equiv 0 \pmod{8}$
  • $11^n - 6 \equiv 0 \pmod{5}$
  • $2^{n+2}+3^{2n+1} \equiv 0 \pmod{7}$
  • $n^3 - n \equiv 0 \pmod{6}$
  • $7^n - 4^n - 3^n \equiv 0 \pmod{12}$

The "17 split" from IB 2023 Nov

$5^{2(k+1)} - 2^{3(k+1)} = 25 \cdot 5^{2k} - 8 \cdot 2^{3k} = \mathbf{17} \cdot 5^{2k} + 8\underbrace{(5^{2k} - 2^{3k})}_{\text{IH} = 17s} = 17(5^{2k} + 8s)$ ✓

TrapWhen writing the IH for divisibility, don't write "$f(k)$ is divisible by $d$" — write "$f(k) = dm$ for some $m \in \mathbb{Z}$". The algebraic form is needed for the inductive step. Without it you can't complete the algebra.

§4 — Inequality Proofs AHL 1.15

Prove $f(n) > g(n)$ (or $\geq$) for all $n \geq n_0$.

The chain-of-inequalities method

Build a chain: $f(k+1) \;\geq\; [\text{use IH}] \;\geq\; g(k+1)$.

Typical structure:

  1. Apply IH to replace $f(k)$ with something involving $g(k)$.
  2. Use a separate algebraic fact to connect to $g(k+1)$.
  3. Justify each $\geq$ step explicitly.

Example (IB 2025 May): Prove $n > \log_2 n$. Step: $k+1 > 1 + \log_2 k$ (by IH) $\geq \log_2(k+1)$ (by helper result).

TrickFor inequality induction, the IB often gives you a helper result in part (a) to use in part (b). The helper result is almost always used as the second link in the chain. Write both links on separate lines with their justification.
TrapThreshold inequalities (e.g. "for all $n \geq 5$"): the base case must be $n = 5$, not $n = 1$. Also, within the inductive step, you must use $k \geq 5$ when making estimates. For example, saying $(k-1)^2 \geq 16$ requires $k \geq 5$.
NoteFor $n! \geq 2^n$ (base $n = 4$): in the inductive step, $k+1 \geq 5 > 2$, so $(k+1)! = (k+1) \cdot k! \geq (k+1) \cdot 2^k > 2 \cdot 2^k = 2^{k+1}$. The key is noting that $k+1 \geq 2$.

§5 — Trigonometric Identity Proofs AHL 1.15

Prove identities of the form $\displaystyle\sum_{r=1}^{n} \mathrm{trig}(r\theta) = \dfrac{\ldots}{\sin\theta}$.

Structure of trig induction

The inductive step: split the sum, apply IH to the $k$-sum, then use a trig identity to collapse the $(k+1)$-th term into the target.

Key identity used in almost every trig induction:

$$2\sin\theta\cos\phi = \sin(\phi+\theta) - \sin(\phi-\theta)$$

or equivalently: $\sin A + \sin B = 2\sin\tfrac{A+B}{2}\cos\tfrac{A-B}{2}$.

De Moivre's theorem proof (always examined)

Use compound-angle formulas in the inductive step:

$$(\cos\theta + i\sin\theta)^{k+1} = \underbrace{(\cos k\theta + i\sin k\theta)}_{\text{IH}}(\cos\theta + i\sin\theta)$$

Expand, apply $\cos(A+B)$ and $\sin(A+B)$, arrive at $\cos(k+1)\theta + i\sin(k+1)\theta$.

TrickCommon trig induction formula: $\cos\theta + \cos 3\theta + \cdots + \cos(2n-1)\theta = \dfrac{\sin 2n\theta}{2\sin\theta}$. Inductive step key: $2\sin\theta\cos(2k+1)\theta = \sin(2k+2)\theta - \sin 2k\theta$, so $\sin 2k\theta$ cancels leaving $\sin(2k+2)\theta$.
TrapWhen adding the common denominator in trig induction, don't forget to multiply the $(k+1)$-th term numerator and denominator by $2\sin\theta$. Write: $\cos(2k+1)\theta = \dfrac{2\sin\theta\cos(2k+1)\theta}{2\sin\theta}$.
NoteFor De Moivre's proof, the IB sometimes asks for $n \in \mathbb{Z}^+$ only (not all integers). In that case, only prove the positive integer case. The extension to $\mathbb{Z}^-$ and $\mathbb{Q}$ is noted as "accepted without proof".

§6 — Calculus: $n$-th Derivative Proofs AHL 1.15

Prove $f^{(n)}(x) = [\text{formula}]$ for $n \in \mathbb{Z}^+$.

Derivative-induction method

Base case: differentiate once (use product rule), show it matches the $n=1$ formula. Note: You need two A1 marks in the base case for derivative proofs — one for the derivative itself, one for matching the formula at $n=1$.

Inductive step: differentiate the inductive hypothesis:

$$f^{(k+1)}(x) = \frac{d}{dx}\!\left[f^{(k)}(x)\right] = \frac{d}{dx}\!\left[\text{IH formula}\right]$$

Use the product rule: $\dfrac{d}{dx}[g(x)e^x] = (g'(x) + g(x))e^x$. Simplify to match $f^{(k+1)}$ formula.

TrickFor $\dfrac{d^n}{dx^n}(x^2 e^x) = [x^2 + 2nx + n(n-1)]e^x$: the pattern at $n = k+1$ gives coefficients $[x^2 + 2(k+1)x + (k+1)k]e^x$. After differentiating: $(2x+2k)e^x + (x^2+2kx+k(k-1))e^x$. Collect: $x^2 + (2k+2)x + (2k + k^2 - k) = x^2 + 2(k+1)x + k(k+1)$. Match!
TrickFor $\dfrac{d^n}{dx^n}(e^x \cos x) = 2^{n/2} e^x \cos\!\left(x + \tfrac{n\pi}{4}\right)$: the key is $e^x\cos\phi - e^x\sin\phi = \sqrt{2}\,e^x\cos(\phi + \tfrac{\pi}{4})$. So differentiating increases the argument by $\tfrac{\pi}{4}$ and multiplies by $\sqrt{2} = 2^{1/2}$.
TrapIn the base case for derivative proofs, two A1 marks are awarded: one for computing $f'(x)$ correctly, and one for verifying it matches the formula at $n=1$. Many students compute the derivative but forget to substitute $n=1$ into the RHS and compare.

§7 — Recurrence Relation Proofs AHL 1.15

Given $u_1$ and $u_{n+1} = f(u_n)$, prove a closed-form formula for $u_n$.

Recurrence-proof method

If asked to conjecture first: compute $u_2, u_3, u_4$ and spot the pattern.

Inductive step: $u_{k+1} = f(u_k) \xrightarrow{\text{sub IH}} f(\text{formula at }k) \xrightarrow{\text{algebra}} \text{formula at }k+1$. The recurrence relation is your starting point — use it immediately, then substitute the IH.

TrickFor $u_{k+1} = 2u_k + 1$ with $u_k = 2^k - 1$: $u_{k+1} = 2(2^k-1)+1 = 2^{k+1} - 2 + 1 = 2^{k+1} - 1$. Done in one line. Always try to substitute in one step before expanding.
NoteFor recurrences involving loan repayments or similar financial models, the IH gives you $u_k$ in terms of $k$, and you substitute into $u_{k+1} = (1+r)u_k - P$. The algebra is longer but the method is identical.

§8 — Combinatorics and Products AHL 1.15

Key combinatorial identity

Pascal's Rule: $\binom{n}{r} + \binom{n}{r+1} = \binom{n+1}{r+1}$.

Used in the inductive step of combinatoric sum proofs: $\binom{k+1}{2} + \binom{k+1}{1} = \binom{k+2}{2}$. This is the single key step for the IB 2024 May Q7 type question.

For product proofs like $\displaystyle\prod_{i=1}^{n}\!\left(1 - \dfrac{1}{i+1}\right) = \dfrac{1}{n+1}$, the inductive step is: $\displaystyle\prod_{i=1}^{k+1}(\ldots) = \dfrac{1}{k+1} \cdot \!\left(1 - \dfrac{1}{k+2}\right) = \dfrac{1}{k+1} \cdot \dfrac{k+1}{k+2} = \dfrac{1}{k+2}$.

TrickFor $x^n - y^n \equiv 0 \pmod{(x-y)}$: write $x^{k+1} - y^{k+1} = x(x^k - y^k) + y^k(x - y)$. The first term uses the IH, the second has factor $(x-y)$ directly.

§9 — Attack Plan by Question Type AHL 1.15

TypeRecognition signalFirst move in inductive step
Sum$\sum_{r=1}^{n} f(r) = S(n)$Write $f(k+1)$ and $S(k+1)$ on the side
Divisibility"divisible by $d$"Write $f(k) = dm$, expand $f(k+1)$, create $f(k)$ inside
Inequality"$>$" or "$\geq$" or "$<$"Set up chain; use IH to bound one side
Trig sumSum of $\cos/\sin$ = fractionSplit sum, use $2\sin\theta\cos\phi$ identity
Derivative"$n$-th derivative of …"Base case: differentiate once; step: differentiate IH
Recurrence$u_{n+1} = f(u_n)$ givenApply recurrence first, then substitute IH
Combinatorics$\sum\binom{r}{j}$ or productsApply Pascal's rule or cancel factorials

§10 — IB Exam Patterns (2020–2025) AHL 1.15

YearQuestion typeMarksWhere
2025 MayInequality with helper ($n > \log_2 n$)7P1 Q8
2024 May TZ1Combinatorics sum ($\sum \binom{r}{1}$)7P1 Q7
2024 May TZ2Calculus ($n$-th derivative of $f(x)$)20P1 Q12
2023 May TZ2Factorial sum7P1 Q7
2023 Nov TZ1Divisibility ($5^{2n} - 2^{3n}$, mod 17)7P1 Q6
2022 NovComplex numbers / induction18P1 Q12
2021 Nov$n$-th derivative of $x^2 e^x$14P1 Q11
2021 MayInequality / alternating sumvariousP1

Top 8 mark-losing mistakes

  1. "Let $n = k$" instead of writing the full IH formula — loses M1 every time.
  2. Missing the conclusion sentence — loses R1 every time.
  3. Base case: only showing one side — loses R1.
  4. Wrong next term in sum proofs (especially factorial denominators).
  5. Circular reasoning: using $P(k+1)$ to prove $P(k+1)$.
  6. Forgetting $m \in \mathbb{Z}$ in divisibility proofs — the conclusion requires this.
  7. Threshold inequalities: using base case $n=1$ when the claim is for $n \geq 5$.
  8. Trig proofs: not writing which identity was applied (cost you A1).
NoteAll IB induction questions are Paper 1 (no GDC). There is no GDC work in this topic. The only calculator-relevant skill is verifying the base case — but all base cases in induction are simple arithmetic.

Worked Example — IB-Style Divisibility Induction

Question (HL Paper 1 style — 7 marks)

Use mathematical induction to prove that $f(n) = 5^{2n} - 2^{3n}$ is divisible by 17 for all $n \in \mathbb{Z}^+$.

Solution

  1. Base case ($n = 1$): $f(1) = 5^2 - 2^3 = 25 - 8 = 17 = 17 \times 1$. So $P(1)$ is true. (R1)
  2. Inductive hypothesis: Assume $P(k)$ is true, i.e. $5^{2k} - 2^{3k} = 17m$ for some $m \in \mathbb{Z}$. (M1)
  3. Inductive step — set up $f(k+1)$: $f(k+1) = 5^{2(k+1)} - 2^{3(k+1)} = 25 \cdot 5^{2k} - 8 \cdot 2^{3k}$. (M1)
  4. Create $f(k)$ inside using the "17 split": $25 \cdot 5^{2k} = 17 \cdot 5^{2k} + 8 \cdot 5^{2k}$, so $f(k+1) = 17 \cdot 5^{2k} + 8 \cdot 5^{2k} - 8 \cdot 2^{3k} = 17 \cdot 5^{2k} + 8(5^{2k} - 2^{3k})$. (A1)
  5. Apply IH and factor out 17: $= 17 \cdot 5^{2k} + 8 \cdot 17m = 17(5^{2k} + 8m)$, where $5^{2k} + 8m \in \mathbb{Z}$. So $f(k+1)$ is divisible by 17. (A1)(A1)
  6. Conclusion: Since $P(1)$ is true, and $P(k)$ true $\Rightarrow$ $P(k+1)$ true for all $k \in \mathbb{Z}^+$, by the principle of mathematical induction $5^{2n} - 2^{3n}$ is divisible by 17 for all $n \in \mathbb{Z}^+$. (R1)

Examiner's note: the "17 split" — turning $25 = 17 + 8$ — is the only non-routine step. Writing the IH as the algebraic form $5^{2k} - 2^{3k} = 17m$ (rather than "is divisible by 17") is what makes the final factoring possible. This is a 2023 Nov TZ1 paper-1-style question.

Common Student Questions

Why does writing "let $n = k$" lose the M1 mark in induction?
The IB mark scheme explicitly states "do not award M1 for statements such as 'let $n = k$'". The inductive hypothesis must be the full formula written out: "Assume $P(k)$ is true, i.e. [formula in $k$]." Saying "let $n = k$" shows you've memorised the form but not understood that you are assuming a specific statement is true. Always write the formula.
Do I really need to write a conclusion sentence every time?
Yes — the final R1 mark is for the conclusion sentence and is awarded as long as you have at least 4 of the previous 6 marks. Even if your algebra has gaps, write: "Since $P(1)$ is true, and $P(k)$ true $\Rightarrow$ $P(k+1)$ true, by the principle of mathematical induction $P(n)$ is true for all $n \in \mathbb{Z}^+$." That single sentence is worth a guaranteed mark.
How do I handle factorial sums like $\displaystyle\sum \dfrac{r}{(r+1)!}$?
When $r = k+1$, the denominator becomes $((k+1)+1)! = (k+2)!$, not $(k+1)!$. To combine fractions across different factorial denominators, use the identity $\dfrac{1}{(k+1)!} = \dfrac{k+2}{(k+2)!}$. This is the single trick that unlocks every IB factorial induction question.
What is the right base case for inequalities like $n! \geq 2^n$?
For threshold inequalities, the base case must match the smallest $n$ for which the claim is true — for $n! \geq 2^n$ that is $n = 4$, not $n = 1$ (since $1! < 2$, $2! < 4$, $3! < 8$, but $4! = 24 \geq 16$). Within the inductive step you must also use $k \geq 4$ in any estimates. Starting at $n = 1$ loses the R1 immediately.
How should I write the inductive hypothesis for divisibility proofs?
Write "Assume $f(k) = dm$ for some $m \in \mathbb{Z}$" — the algebraic form, not just "$f(k)$ is divisible by $d$". You will need to substitute $dm$ into the inductive step to factor out $d$ at the end. Without the algebraic form you cannot complete the algebra and lose every A1 mark in the inductive step.

Get the printable PDF version

Same cheatsheet, formatted for A4 print — keep it next to your study desk. Free for signed-in users.