Free worked solutions · 2026 Edition

IB Chemistry R1.4: Entropy and spontaneity worked solutions

Worked solutions to every practice question in R1.4: Entropy and spontaneity of Photon Chemistry: Study Guide for the IB Diploma (SL & HL). Try each question, then compare your working with the full solution.

  • SL & HL
  • 23 questions
  • Full worked solutions
  • Free, no sign-up

Basic practice

Question B1

entropy-states[1 mark]
A gas in a rigid sealed vessel is cooled without condensation. Which explanation describes its entropy change?
A   It decreases because fewer energy distributions are accessible. B   It is unchanged because the number of particles is unchanged. C   It increases because cooling releases heat to the surroundings. D   It is unchanged because entropy depends only on the container volume.
Show solutionHide solution
A. Removing thermal energy leaves fewer energy allocations accessible to the gas. Fixed volume and fixed particle number do not fix entropy.

Final answer

A

Question B2

spontaneity-signs[1 mark]
For a model process, \Delta H^{\ominus}=-24.6\,\text{kJ mol}^{-1} and \Delta S^{\ominus}=-58.5\,\text{J K}^{-1}\text{ mol}^{-1}. Both remain constant. Which condition gives \Delta G^{\ominus}<0?
A   0<T<147\,\text{K} only B   0<T<421\,\text{K} C   T=421\,\text{K} only D   T>421\,\text{K}
Show solutionHide solution
B. In kJ units, the model gives \Delta G^\circ=−24.6+0.0585T. Its zero is 420.5128 K, reported as 421 K; the unrounded boundary is excluded. The forward standard change is negative below that boundary.

Final answer

B: 0<T<421\,\mathrm K (rounded boundary; the exact zero is excluded).

Question B3

dg-calc[1 mark]
A model reaction has \Delta H^{\ominus}=+12.0\,\text{kJ mol}^{-1} and \Delta S^{\ominus}=+22.0\,\text{J K}^{-1}\text{ mol}^{-1} at 350\,\text{K}. What is \Delta G^{\ominus}?
A   -7.69\times10^{3}\,\text{kJ mol}^{-1} B   -4.3\,\text{kJ mol}^{-1} C   4.3\,\text{kJ mol}^{-1} D   19.7\,\text{kJ mol}^{-1}
Show solutionHide solution
C. Convert 22.0 J K−1 mol−1 to 0.0220 kJ K−1 mol−1. Then 12.0−350(0.0220)=+4.30 kJ mol−1, matching the +4.3 option.

Final answer

C: +4.3\,\mathrm{kJ\,mol^{-1}}.

Question B4

equilibrium-gibbs[1 mark]
A reaction mixture has Q=K/4 at a fixed positive absolute temperature. Both quantities are dimensionless. Which conclusion is justified?
A   The forward reaction is spontaneous, even if \Delta G^{\ominus} is positive. B   The reverse reaction is spontaneous because Q is less than K. C   The mixture is at equilibrium because K is fixed. D   The standard Gibbs energy change must become negative as Q falls.
Show solutionHide solution
A. Eliminate the standard term using \Delta G^\circ=−RT ln K: \Delta G=RT ln(Q/K). Here ln(1/4)<0 and RT>0. A positive standard Gibbs change is compatible with this negative actual change.

Final answer

A

Question B5

entropy-reaction-compare[1 mark]
For these supplied model species, which transformation consumes gas overall and therefore suggests a negative reaction entropy change? A \ce{PQ(g) -> P(g) + Q(g)} B \ce{P(g) + 2Q(g) -> PQ2(l)} C \ce{Q2(l) -> Q2(g)} D \ce{P2Q4(g) -> 2PQ2(g)}
Show solutionHide solution
B. Combining one gaseous P with two gaseous Q amounts makes liquid PQ2: the gaseous amount drops from three to zero. A changes one into two gas amounts, C changes zero into one, and D changes one into two. Read the phase labels before adding the coefficients.

Final answer

B

Question B6

delta-s-calc[2 marks]
For model species, \ce{2X(g) -> X2(g)}. The supplied S^\circ values are 145 for X and 232 for X_2, in \mathrm{J\,K^{-1}\,mol^{-1}}. Calculate \Delta S^\circ.
Show solutionHide solution
The product contributes 232 and the reactants contribute 2(145)=290. Subtract reactants from products: \Delta S^\circ=232-290=-58\,\mathrm{J\,K^{-1}\,mol^{-1}}. The coefficient applies to the whole molar entropy value. An element at ordinary temperature would also contribute its tabulated absolute entropy; the zero-formation convention does not apply to an entropy sum.

Final answer

-58\,\mathrm{J\,K^{-1}\,mol^{-1}}.

Question B7

spontaneity-meaning[2 marks]
A slow process has actual \Delta G=-2.40\,\mathrm{kJ\,mol^{-1}} at constant temperature and pressure. State the sign of the total entropy change and explain why the process can remain slow.
Show solutionHide solution
At constant temperature and pressure, \Delta S_{\rm total}=-\Delta G/T>0 because T>0 and \Delta G<0. The Gibbs sign gives the thermodynamic direction. A large activation energy can still give a small rate.

Final answer

Total entropy increases; an activation barrier can limit the rate.

Question B8

gibbs-graph-data[2 marks]
A straight-line model for \Delta G^\circ against T has gradient -0.0650\,\mathrm{kJ\,K^{-1}\,mol^{-1}} and extrapolated intercept +19.5\,\mathrm{kJ\,mol^{-1}}. State \Delta S^\circ and \Delta H^\circ.
Show solutionHide solution
Compare \Delta G^\circ=\Delta H^\circ-T\Delta S^\circ with a straight line. The gradient is -\Delta S^\circ, so \Delta S^\circ=+0.0650\,\mathrm{kJ\,K^{-1}\,mol^{-1}}=+65.0\,\mathrm{J\,K^{-1}\,mol^{-1}}. The extrapolated intercept is \Delta H^\circ=+19.5\,\mathrm{kJ\,mol^{-1}}; this is a model parameter. The zero-kelvin intercept is an extrapolation; it does not assert that the phase and constant-data assumptions remain valid at zero kelvin.

Final answer

+65.0\,\mathrm{J\,K^{-1}\,mol^{-1}}; +19.5\,\mathrm{kJ\,mol^{-1}}.

Tutorial practice

Question U1

entropy-sign-reason, delta-s-calc[4 marks]
A thermodynamic assessment examines 2\,\mathrm{HCHO(g)}\rightarrow\mathrm{CH_3OH(l)}+\mathrm{CO(g)} at 298.15\,\mathrm{K}. The respective standard molar entropies of methanal, methanol and carbon monoxide are 219, 127 and 198\,\mathrm{J\,K^{-1}\,mol^{-1}}.
(a) Predict the entropy sign from the physical states and gas amounts. Give a reason.   [2]
(b) Obtain \Delta S^{\ominus} for the equation as written.   [2]
Show solutionHide solution
(a) Expect a decrease [1]: the equation consumes two gas amounts and returns one, with the remaining product liquid [1]. (b) Product entropy sum is 127+198=325; reactant sum is 2×219=438 [1]. Their difference is −113 J K−1 mol−1 for the written equation [1].

Final answer

(a) Negative: gas amount decreases. (b) -113\,\mathrm{J\,K^{-1}\,mol^{-1}}.

Question U2

[5 marks]
A model desorption step has \Delta H^{\ominus}=+42.0\,\mathrm{kJ\,mol^{-1}} and \Delta S^{\ominus}=+150\,\mathrm{J\,K^{-1}\,mol^{-1}}. Both are taken as temperature independent.
(a) Find the temperature where \Delta G^{\ominus}=0, in kelvin and degrees Celsius.   [2]
(b) State the temperature inequality for a favourable standard Gibbs change, with a reason.   [2]
(c) Find \Delta G^{\ominus} at 300\,\mathrm{K}.   [1]
Show solutionHide solution
(a) Use 42.0/0.150=280 K [1]; subtract 273.15 to obtain 6.85 °C [1]. This is a model result, rather than a measured transition temperature. (b) T>280 K [1]; the term −0.150T becomes more negative as T rises [1]. (c) 42.0−300(0.150)=−3.00 kJ mol−1 [1].

Final answer

(a) 280\,\mathrm K; 6.85\,{}^\circ\mathrm C. (b) T>280\,\mathrm K; the entropy contribution grows. (c) -3.00\,\mathrm{kJ\,mol^{-1}}.

Question U3

dg-calc, gibbs-chain[4 marks]
For a model liquid rearrangement at 360\,\mathrm{K}, the standard enthalpy change is +12.5\,\mathrm{kJ\,mol^{-1}} and the standard Gibbs change is -3.70\,\mathrm{kJ\,mol^{-1}}.
(a) Obtain \Delta S^{\ominus} in \mathrm{J\,K^{-1}\,mol^{-1}}.   [2]
(b) Explain how an endothermic conversion can have a negative standard Gibbs change at this temperature.   [2]
Show solutionHide solution
(a) Rearrange to \Delta S^\circ=(\Delta H^\circ−\Delta G^\circ)/T: [12.5−(−3.70)]/360=0.0450 kJ K−1 mol−1 [1], or +45.0 J K−1 mol−1 [1]. (b) Here T\Delta S^\circ=+16.2 kJ mol−1 [1]. Subtracting this from +12.5 kJ mol−1 leaves −3.70 kJ mol−1, so the entropy contribution exceeds the enthalpy cost [1].

Final answer

(a) +45.0\,\mathrm{J\,K^{-1}\,mol^{-1}}. (b) T\Delta S^\circ=16.2\,\mathrm{kJ\,mol^{-1}} exceeds the enthalpy cost.

Question U4

equilibrium-gibbs[4 marks]
A molecular isomerisation has \Delta G^{\ominus}=-7.20\,\mathrm{kJ\,mol^{-1}} at 320\,\mathrm{K}. The standard Gibbs change applies to conversion of isomer \mathrm{A} to isomer \mathrm{B}. Take R=8.31\,\mathrm{J\,K^{-1}\,mol^{-1}} and dimensionless equilibrium constants.
(a) Calculate the forward equilibrium constant.   [2]
(b) Determine the reverse constant and the reverse standard Gibbs change at this temperature.   [2]
Show solutionHide solution
(a) ln K=7200/(8.31×320)=2.707581; exponentiation gives K=15.0 [2: logarithm and result]. (b) Use the unrounded K: K_{\rm reverse}=0.0667 [1]. Interchanging initial and final states gives \Delta G^\circ_{\rm reverse}=+7.20 kJ mol−1 [1].

Final answer

(a) 15.0. (b) 0.0667; +7.20\,\mathrm{kJ\,mol^{-1}}.

Question U5

gibbs-graph-data, threshold-temperature[4 marks]
A model gives \Delta G^\circ=+7.80\,\mathrm{kJ\,mol^{-1}} at 260 K and -3.90\,\mathrm{kJ\,mol^{-1}} at 390 K. Treat \Delta H^\circ and \Delta S^\circ as constant. (a) Determine \Delta S^\circ and \Delta H^\circ. [3] (b) Find the temperature interval giving \Delta G^\circ<0 in this model. [1]
Show solutionHide solution
(a) The gradient is (-3.90-7.80)/(390-260)=-0.0900\,\mathrm{kJ\,K^{-1}\,mol^{-1}}. Hence \Delta S^\circ=+90.0\,\mathrm{J\,K^{-1}\,mol^{-1}}. Substitution at 260 K gives \Delta H^\circ=7.80+260(0.0900)=31.2\,\mathrm{kJ\,mol^{-1}}. (b) Set the standard change to zero: T_*=31.2/0.0900=346.666\ldots\,\mathrm K. The line slopes down, so \Delta G^\circ<0 above this boundary, within the constant-data model. The boundary is excluded.

Final answer

(a) +90.0\,\mathrm{J\,K^{-1}\,mol^{-1}}; +31.2\,\mathrm{kJ\,mol^{-1}}. (b) T>347\,\mathrm K (rounded boundary).

Question U6

spontaneity-meaning[4 marks]
A crystallisation releases 8.40\,\mathrm{kJ\,mol^{-1}} into a large bath at 280 K. Its system entropy change is -24.0\,\mathrm{J\,K^{-1}\,mol^{-1}}. (a) Calculate the entropy change of the surroundings. [2] (b) Calculate the total entropy change and the corresponding Gibbs change. [2]
Show solutionHide solution
(a) Heat enters the bath, giving \Delta S_{\rm surroundings}=+8400/280=+30.0\,\mathrm{J\,K^{-1}\,mol^{-1}}. (b) The combined change is -24.0+30.0=+6.00\,\mathrm{J\,K^{-1}\,mol^{-1}}. Thus \Delta G=-280(6.00)=-1680\,\mathrm{J\,mol^{-1}}=-1.68\,\mathrm{kJ\,mol^{-1}}. The surroundings more than offset the system entropy decrease. Use the bath temperature in kelvin because its entropy gained per unit heat depends on absolute temperature.

Final answer

(a) +30.0\,\mathrm{J\,K^{-1}\,mol^{-1}}. (b) +6.00\,\mathrm{J\,K^{-1}\,mol^{-1}}; -1.68\,\mathrm{kJ\,mol^{-1}}.

Question U7

dg-calc[3 marks]
For the supplied balanced model \ce{L + 2M -> N}, formation Gibbs energies are -32.0, -18.0 and -79.0\,\mathrm{kJ\,mol^{-1}} for L, M and N respectively, all in the specified states at one temperature. (a) Calculate the standard reaction Gibbs energy. [2] (b) Give the standard Gibbs change for twice the reverse equation. [1]
Show solutionHide solution
(a) Sum the formation contributions with their coefficients: \Delta G^\circ=-79.0-[-32.0+2(-18.0)]=-11.0\,\mathrm{kJ\,mol^{-1}}. (b) Reversal changes the sign and doubling multiplies the result by two: -2(-11.0)=+22.0\,\mathrm{kJ\,mol^{-1}}. These are changes per written equation. Each formation value refers to one mole of its species, so the coefficient of M must be included in the reactant sum.

Final answer

(a) -11.0\,\mathrm{kJ\,mol^{-1}}. (b) +22.0\,\mathrm{kJ\,mol^{-1}}.

Question U8

temperature-effect, spontaneity-signs[3 marks]
Process P has \Delta H^\circ<0 and \Delta S^\circ>0. Process Q has \Delta H^\circ<0 and \Delta S^\circ<0. Assume their signs and phases persist over the temperature range. (a) Explain why P has \Delta G^\circ<0 throughout the model range. [1] (b) Explain how increasing temperature can reverse the sign of \Delta G^\circ for Q. [2]
Show solutionHide solution
For P, both \Delta H^\circ and -T\Delta S^\circ are negative at every positive temperature in the model. For Q, the enthalpy term is negative but -T\Delta S^\circ is positive and grows with temperature. Q therefore has negative standard Gibbs energy below its positive threshold T_*=\Delta H^\circ/\Delta S^\circ, zero at the threshold and positive above it.

Final answer

P: negative \Delta G^\circ throughout. Q: negative below \Delta H^\circ/\Delta S^\circ, positive above.

Advanced practice

Question A1

entropy-states, entropy-sign-reason[6 marks]
An isomerisation model converts gaseous trans-but-2-ene into gaseous cis-but-2-ene. Both have the molecular formula \mathrm{C_4H_8}. Their standard molar entropies are 297 and 301\,\mathrm{J\,K^{-1}\,mol^{-1}}, respectively.
(a) Determine \Delta S^{\ominus} and explain why equal gas amounts do not force it to be zero.   [3]
(b) The standard enthalpy change is +4\,\mathrm{kJ\,mol^{-1}}. Estimate \Delta G^{\ominus} at 298.15\,\mathrm{K}.   [2]
(c) Explain why a count of gas molecules is insufficient for ranking small entropy differences between molecular isomers.   [1]
Show solutionHide solution
(a) Product minus reactant gives 301−297=+4 J K−1 mol−1 [2: setup and difference]. Molecular energy arrangements differ between these isomers, even with the same gas amount [1]. (b) 4−298.15(0.004)=+2.8074 kJ mol−1 before rounding [1]; report about +3 kJ mol−1 at the coarse precision supplied [1]. (c) Gas amount is a qualitative indicator; this close comparison needs molecular entropy data [1].

Final answer

(a) +4\,\mathrm{J\,K^{-1}\,mol^{-1}}; molecular energy arrangements differ. (b) About +3\,\mathrm{kJ\,mol^{-1}}. (c) Numerical entropy data resolve the small difference.

Question A2

[6 marks]
A model gas capture has \Delta H^{\ominus}=-54.0\,\mathrm{kJ\,mol^{-1}} and \Delta S^{\ominus}=-135\,\mathrm{J\,K^{-1}\,mol^{-1}}. The reverse change regenerates the capture material. Use constant thermodynamic values throughout.
(a) Find the boundary temperature for capture and the temperature condition for a negative capture Gibbs change.   [2]
(b) State the enthalpy and entropy changes for regeneration, with units.   [2]
(c) Obtain the standard Gibbs change for regeneration at 450\,\mathrm{K} and interpret it.   [2]
Show solutionHide solution
(a) −54.0/(−0.135)=400 K [1]; capture has \Delta G^\circ<0 for 0<T<400 K within the model [1]. (b) Reverse both state differences: \Delta H^\circ=+54.0 kJ mol−1 and \Delta S^\circ=+135 J K−1 mol−1 [2]. (c) Regeneration at 450 K has 54.0−450(0.135)=−6.75 kJ mol−1 [1], favouring the reverse route at standard-state composition [1].

Final answer

(a) 400\,\mathrm K; below it. (b) +54.0\,\mathrm{kJ\,mol^{-1}}; +135\,\mathrm{J\,K^{-1}\,mol^{-1}}. (c) -6.75\,\mathrm{kJ\,mol^{-1}}; favourable standard change.

Question A3

gibbs-chain, delta-s-calc[7 marks]
A chloromethane treatment model considers \mathrm{CH_3Cl(g)}+\mathrm{H_2O(g)}\rightarrow\mathrm{CH_3OH(l)}+\mathrm{HCl(g)}. Use the following reference-temperature data.
\begin{array}{c|rr}\text{Species}&S^{\ominus}/\mathrm{J\,K^{-1}\,mol^{-1}}&\Delta H_{\mathrm{f}}^{\ominus}/\mathrm{kJ\,mol^{-1}}\\\hline\mathrm{CH_3Cl(g)}&235&-82\\\mathrm{H_2O(g)}&189&-242\\\mathrm{CH_3OH(l)}&127&-239\\\mathrm{HCl(g)}&187&-92\end{array}
(a) Calculate both \Delta H^{\ominus} and \Delta S^{\ominus}.   [4]
(b) Using constant values of these quantities, estimate \Delta G^{\ominus} at 300\,\mathrm{K}.   [2]
(c) A student infers a favourable standard Gibbs change solely from the exothermic enthalpy. Assess the inference using your results.   [1]
Show solutionHide solution
(a) The formation-enthalpy sums are −331 and −324 kJ mol−1, giving \Delta H^\circ=−7 kJ mol−1 [2]. The entropy sums are 314 and 424 J K−1 mol−1, giving \Delta S^\circ=−110 J K−1 mol−1 [2]. (b) −7−300(−0.110)=+26 kJ mol−1 [2: compatible units/substitution and result]. (c) Exothermicity alone gives the wrong verdict here; the 33 kJ mol−1 entropy penalty outweighs the 7 kJ mol−1 enthalpy benefit [1].

Final answer

(a) -7\,\mathrm{kJ\,mol^{-1}}; -110\,\mathrm{J\,K^{-1}\,mol^{-1}}. (b) +26\,\mathrm{kJ\,mol^{-1}}. (c) Entropy opposes and outweighs the enthalpy benefit.

Question A4

equilibrium-gibbs[7 marks]
A time-resolved simulation follows two dissolved molecular isomers, labelled \mathrm{A} and \mathrm{B}, interconverting at 310\,\mathrm{K}. Their activity ratio is modelled by Q=[\mathrm{B}]/[\mathrm{A}]. Both concentrations have the same units and their ratio is dimensionless. The independent thermodynamic value is K=4.00, and R=8.31\,\mathrm{J\,K^{-1}\,mol^{-1}}.
\begin{array}{c|rrr}\text{Time}/\mathrm{min}&[\mathrm{A}]/\mathrm{mol\,dm^{-3}}&[\mathrm{B}]/\mathrm{mol\,dm^{-3}}&\text{Observation}\\\hline0&0.0800&0.0200&\text{just mixed}\\5&0.0400&0.0600&\text{still changing}\\20&0.0200&0.0800&\text{unchanged thereafter}\end{array}
(a) Find Q at 5\,\mathrm{min} and explain why this ratio cannot yet be called K.   [2]
(b) Calculate \Delta G^{\ominus} at this temperature and the actual reaction \Delta G at 5\,\mathrm{min}.   [3]
(c) Use both the quotient and the final observation to assess whether equilibrium has been reached at the last time.   [2]
Show solutionHide solution
(a) At five minutes Q=0.0600/0.0400=1.50 [1]. This differs from 4.00 and the concentrations are still evolving [1]. (b) −8.31×310×ln(4.00)/1000=−3.57 kJ mol−1 [1]. For that mixture use RT ln(Q/K) [1], yielding −2.53 kJ mol−1 [1]. (c) The last ratio is 0.0800/0.0200=4.00 [1]. Agreement with K, together with stable concentrations, supports equilibrium; actual \Delta G=0 [1].

Final answer

(a) 1.50; composition is still changing. (b) -3.57 and -2.53\,\mathrm{kJ\,mol^{-1}}, respectively. (c) Q=4.00=K and stable concentrations support equilibrium; actual \Delta G=0.

Connected questions

Question X1

gibbs-chain, threshold-temperature[7 marks]
R1.4 + R1.2. A proposed heat-storage step has a Hess route with \Delta H_1^\circ=+64.0 and \Delta H_2^\circ=-16.0\,\mathrm{kJ\,mol^{-1}}; the desired step is route 1 plus route 2. Its \Delta S^\circ is +120\,\mathrm{J\,K^{-1}\,mol^{-1}}, constant over 300–500 K. (a) Use Hess addition to find the step’s \Delta H^\circ. [1] (b) Find \Delta G^\circ at 440 K and the temperature at which its sign changes. [3] (c) At 360 K, evaluate the reverse step. Given w_{\rm out,max}=-\Delta G, find its maximum non-expansion work per mole for a reversible standard-state step. [3]
Show solutionHide solution
(a) Hess addition gives 64.0-16.0=+48.0\,\mathrm{kJ\,mol^{-1}}. (b) Convert entropy to 0.120\,\mathrm{kJ\,K^{-1}\,mol^{-1}}. At 440 K, \Delta G^\circ=48.0-440(0.120)=-4.80\,\mathrm{kJ\,mol^{-1}}; the zero is 48.0/0.120=400\,\mathrm K. (c) At 360 K the forward standard change is 48.0-360(0.120)=+4.80\,\mathrm{kJ\,mol^{-1}}. Reversal gives -4.80\,\mathrm{kJ\,mol^{-1}}. By the supplied work relationship, its reversible maximum non-expansion work output is 4.80\,\mathrm{kJ\,mol^{-1}}.

Final answer

(a) +48.0\,\mathrm{kJ\,mol^{-1}}. (b) -4.80\,\mathrm{kJ\,mol^{-1}} at 440 K; threshold 400 K. (c) Reverse step releases 4.80\,\mathrm{kJ\,mol^{-1}} maximum non-expansion work at 360 K.

Question X2

equilibrium-gibbs[6 marks]
R1.4 + R2.3. An ideal solution contains interconverting isomers A and B at 305 K. For \ce{A <=> B}, K=6.00 and Q=[\mathrm B]/[\mathrm A]. Initially [\mathrm A]=0.0700 and [\mathrm B]=0.0300\,\mathrm{mol\,dm^{-3}}; their sum stays fixed. (a) Calculate Q and state the thermodynamic direction. [1] (b) Calculate the standard and actual reaction Gibbs energies. [3] (c) Find the equilibrium concentration of B. [2]
Show solutionHide solution
(a) Q=0.0300/0.0700=3/7=0.428571\ldots<6.00, so the forward direction is favoured. (b) With R=8.31\,\mathrm{J\,K^{-1}\,mol^{-1}}, \Delta G^\circ=-8.31(305)\ln6/1000=-4.54130\ldots\,\mathrm{kJ\,mol^{-1}}, or -4.54. The actual change is 8.31(305)\ln[(3/7)/6]/1000=-6.68882\ldots\,\mathrm{kJ\,mol^{-1}}, or -6.69. (c) At equilibrium let [\mathrm B]=b; then [\mathrm A]=0.1000-b and b/(0.1000-b)=6. Thus b=0.6000/7=0.085714\ldots\,\mathrm{mol\,dm^{-3}}, or 0.0857.

Final answer

(a) Q=0.429; forward drive. (b) \Delta G^\circ=-4.54; \Delta G=-6.69\,\mathrm{kJ\,mol^{-1}}. (c) [\mathrm B]=0.0857\,\mathrm{mol\,dm^{-3}}.

Question X3

spontaneity-meaning, dg-calc[6 marks]
R1.4 + R2.2. An uncatalysed model reaction has \Delta H^\circ=-32.0\,\mathrm{kJ\,mol^{-1}} and \Delta S^\circ=-60.0\,\mathrm{J\,K^{-1}\,mol^{-1}} at 300 K. A catalyst lowers its forward activation energy by 12.0\,\mathrm{kJ\,mol^{-1}} without changing the Arrhenius prefactor. (a) Calculate \Delta G^\circ. [1] (b) Using the supplied k=A\exp[-E_{\rm a}/(RT)], calculate the rate-constant ratio and state whether K changes. [3] (c) Explain why little product may appear before catalysis and whether catalysis changes the final equilibrium composition. [2]
Show solutionHide solution
(a) \Delta G^\circ=-32.0-300(-0.0600)=-14.0\,\mathrm{kJ\,mol^{-1}}. (b) Divide the supplied Arrhenius expressions; the prefactors cancel, so k_{\rm cat}/k_{\rm uncat}=\exp[12000/(8.31\times300)]=123.159\ldots, or 123. The catalyst alters barriers but leaves the standard Gibbs difference and therefore K unchanged. (c) A small uncatalysed rate can prevent observable conversion despite a favourable standard Gibbs change. The catalyst accelerates approach to the same equilibrium at fixed temperature; it does not shift its composition.

Final answer

(a) -14.0\,\mathrm{kJ\,mol^{-1}}. (b) k_{\rm cat}/k_{\rm uncat}=123; same K. (c) Kinetic barrier; equilibrium composition is unchanged.

From the book

Photon Chemistry: Study Guide for the IB Diploma (SL & HL)

Entropy and spontaneity from the core ideas to full exam questions, with question types, worked examples and graded practice.

About the book